The words and phrases below are related to noise and its adverse health effects.
Please contact us with suggestions for other terms that should be included here.
A-Weighting — A way of filtering sound measurements to focus on the upper mid-range frequencies of the human voice, and de-emphasize other frequencies (especially the more disruptive low-frequency bass common in cities), thereby actively skewing sound data by making decibel levels appear lower. Unfortunately, most municipal regulations and enforcement procedures require sound measurements in A-weighted decibels. The Noise Project’s sound-monitoring initiatives use more accurate C-weighting.
This mid-range focus reportedly originated from occupational health and safety concerns that noise-induced hearing loss in workplaces — caused by industrial processes that permanently impair a worker’s ability to hear their colleagues and / or supervisors — could result in a legal claim for compensation.
“Boy Racers” — A British term for the small cohort of young men who speed around cities in cars with modified exhaust systems, making excessive noise and otherwise threatening public safety (see “decibel masculinity”). Boy racers in Providence tend to focus more on noise than speed.
C-Weighting — A form of acoustic filtering that retains most sound at the lower (bass) end of the sonic spectrum, such as sound from internal-combustion engines in vehicles and gas-fueled leafblowers, and bass-heavy subwoofer speakers, in contrast to A-weighting, which excludes it.
Lower-frequency noise travels farther than higher-frequency sound, and more easily penetrates solid materials such as building walls, making it more disruptive — and critical to measure — in dense urban areas. C-weighting is closer to unweighted measurements (confusingly referred to as “Z-weighting”). For a visual comparison of effects of different weightings, visit the Noise Project’s sound-monitoring initiative.
Decibel (dB) — The most common metric for how loud sound is. Note that decibels are a logarithmic scale, which means they increase at an escalating rate, so that relatively small rises in the dB number are actually substantially higher sound levels. This differs from a linear scale, which increases at a constant rate, so that doubling a number makes it twice as high, triple is three times higher, etc.
Decibel Masculinity (a.k.a, machismo, toxic masculinity) — A performative, anti-social form of male identity in which sound levels are seen as a metric for how “manly” someone is. This mostly manifests among younger men competing (both figuratively and literally) to see who can be louder, often using a vehicle engine / muffler or over-amplified audio equipment, but also fireworks and other means, and usually in deliberately transgressive ways such as late at night, in close proximity to other people, etc.1 (See also boy racer, noise bully, and the “man-noise-sphere”)
Deterrence — The idea that a negative response to anti-social behavior will discourage people from repeating it, and the basis for most law enforcement. Laws and regulations aren’t predicated on the idea that everyone who violates them will be observed and penalized, but rather on sufficient risk that it could happen to cause people to avoid doing so. For this reason, anyone who says something like, “The police can’t be everywhere to catch everyone” making excessive noise is either seriously confused about how society actually functions, or is being disingenuous.
Thus, fining those who violate noise limits is not merely a form of retroactive punishment, but serves to prevent future violations by demonstrating the consequences. Conversely, the absence of repercussions encourages further violations by communicating that noise is tolerated and even “allowed,” and therefore people are entitled to be as loud as they want. (See regulatory theater, noise impunity / entitlement)
Learned Helplessness — Psychological condition in which a person continuously facing uncontrollable negative conditions eventually stops trying to address them, even when there are mechanisms to do so, due to their ongoing experience of powerlessness, resulting in a sense of passivity, apathy, resignation, and depression. Many Providence residents unwillingly exposed to excessive noise exhibit this response, which is often associated with other forms of trauma, abuse, and other long-term stressful environments.
NIMBY — Originally an acronym for “Not in My Backyard,” which referred to homeowners who sought to impede public-interest initiatives such as non-profit social services and affordable housing, on the grounds that government action based on concern for others would lower adjacent property values.
Over time, however, the term was co-opted by private for-profit developers and their allies — the antithesis of the public sector — as a way to dismiss or otherwise stifle complaints about excessive noise from commercial venues such as bars, restaurants, and other performance spaces (see noise denialism).
These venues — and the unhealthy sound levels they inflict on those nearby — are almost always far from the backyards of the people who develop, own, or patronize them, making them the real NIMBYs. As a result, we’ve updated the acronym to more accurately stand for “Not Imposed on Me, But on You.”2
Noise — Sound at a volume level that 1) compels people to change their behavior, and / or 2) adversely affects them physiologically.3 Exposure to excessive noise can be measured by objective criteria such as decibels, blood-pressure level, or hearing loss, and despite rampant denialism cannot be avoided through psycho-social adaptation: i.e., “getting used to it,” etc). In other words, even people who think they’ve adapted to or are unbothered by noise are still adversely affected by it, regardless of their view.
Noise Bully — Individuals who deliberately generate excessive and unhealthy noise, and then threaten those who object / take action to curtail their exposure with violence or other forms of retaliation. Some experts theorize that this is actually the real motivation for transgressive noise: to provoke a confrontation that allows the bully to demonstrate his power. (See also decibel masculinity).
Noise Denialism — Dismissing objections to excessive and unhealthy sound levels by asserting that they don’t adversely affect human health (contrary to more than a half century of research) or disturb people the denialists identify with. Conditioned by the normalization of excessive noise, denialists believe it has no effects on themselves or anyone, and often consider it an entitlement.
This reflexive response is often accompanied by assertions about having lived in loud areas longer than those concerned by excessive noise there, and / or that those objecting to noise are overly sensitive, unfamiliar with supposedly immutable conditions of urban life, have an ulterior motive such as deliberate gentrification or racism, and other variations of the “who versus what” deflection.
Noise Entitlement — The self-serving belief that one has a “right” to make noise excessive noise based on one’s personal identity, such as being a member of a certain group or the duration of one’s residence in an area (i.e., “We grew up here, so we get to decide how loud it is”), in defiance of local and / or state sound limits. The act of deliberately flouting noise limits is often tied to self-identity, whether it’s performative masculinity or a demonstration of self-defined sectarian privilege.
Noise Equity — The idea that more municipal effort and resources should be expended to reduce excessive and unhealthy noise in areas with recurrently higher noise levels, based on the broader principle that resources are most needed and impactful in places with the greatest lack of recourse. A noise policy that treats loud and quiet areas the same neglects those exposed to more noise.
Noise Impunity — In the absence of enforcement or other consequences for making excessive noise, the notion that someone can be as loud as they want, whenever and wherever they want. In many Providence neighborhoods, a small number of mostly young men demonstrate effective noise impunity.
Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) — The permanent diminution of aural acuity caused to damage to the inner ear from exposure to excessive sound levels. The gradual hearing loss over time that most people associate with simply getting older is actually due to the cumulative exposure to noise over one’s lifetime: significant noise-induced hearing loss in the elderly is not a natural occurrence.
”Noise Tax” — The cumulative financial costs people incur to avoid or reduce their exposure to noise. Household expenses include higher ongoing housing costs in quieter neighborhoods, unnecessary expenses associated with being forced to keep windows closed in warm weather, such as the purchase and ongoing electricity costs of fans and air-conditioning, year-round use of fans / “white noise” machines / noise-canceling headphones to counter outside noise, and material / labor costs of sound barriers such as heavy curtains, multi-pane replacement windows, air sealing, etc.
At the broader societal level, indirect noise taxes include higher ongoing healthcare costs due to the adverse physical / mental health effects of sleep deprivation and excessive noise, ongoing municipal and state noise enforcement expenditures, lower property valuations / unrealized municipal revenue in excessively loud residential neighborhoods, lower commercial sales / unrealized tax revenue in louder commercial areas, and other persistent, “depressive” effects of unabated noise.
Presumption of Necessity — A legal concept that deems certain actions to be essential and valid. For example, scientific research has documented a minimum duration and “quality” of sleep necessary to maintain human health, which in turn requires certain basic environmental conditions such as low sound levels to enable restful sleep. Both sleep and the conditions it requires are legal necessities.
By contrast, a small cohort of PVD residents and government officials (i.e., some members of the Board of Licenses, ACT staff, City Council, etc) actively enable unnecessary noise by promoting the unfounded idea that music and vehicles “need” to be excessively loud — and willfully ignore the effects on sleep. But presumption of necessity differentiates between documented need and mere personal preferences.
Quality of Health — A more accurate alternative to the tendency to describe excessive noise as a “quality of life” issue, which effectively ignores (either innocently or intentionally) its documented adverse health effects. Noise negatively affects people’s daily lives in a variety of ways, but its most critical effects are on the health of everyone in the community, and are the biggest reason to reduce it to safer levels.
Regulatory Theater — Performatively writing and enforcing ordinances in an inconsistent and ineffective manner that renders them essentially meaningless, with little practical effect on the conduct they’re ostensibly intended to regulate. Examples include the City Council passing noise-related ordinances with weak enforcement mechanisms (like the 2025 leafblower law), or disregarding ordinance enforcement after passage, and the sporadic enforcement of noise laws by city agencies such as the police, Board of Licenses, and ACT that yields little deterrent effect that’s the basis of regulation. (See also “politics of gesture”)
Repeat offenders — In any community, a relatively small number of people commit a disproportionate amount of crime, including illegal noise. Providence‘s government has a lot of data on the locations of recurrent noise sources that residents report, yet treats most of them like first-time offenders, and continues to issue multiple warnings instead of escalating citations designed to deter their deliberate, unhealthy, and unnecessary anti-social behavior.
Sleep Deprivation — Preventing others from getting the minimum amount of sleep that humans need to maintain basic health, generally recognized as between six and eight hours per night. Sleep deprivation has historically been used as a torture technique, because it seriously impairs its victims without leaving any marks or other tangible evidence.
Recent scientific research has associated numerous adverse health effects with recurrent deprivation of sufficient sleep, and public-health experts describe the issue as an epidemic and crisis. No one who purports to support community health can rationalize unnecessarily excessive noise that disrupts other people’s sleep. (See the ‘who vs what’ deflection and second definition of woke)
Soundscape — Just as the landscape is the environment that people can see in a given location, the soundscape is all of the sound in a given location. And like the city’s parks, the Providence and Seekonk rivers, or other public spaces, the soundscape is a commons: a community resource shared by all, and thus not subject to control or despoiling by individuals. But in the same way that people can recklessly (and illegally) pollute various forms of commons, they can also pollute the soundscape by generating excessive noise that imposes itself on others and obscures the rest of the soundscape.
Warm-Weather Dread — The anxiety / apprehension many Providence residents begin to feel in late winter as the average temperature begins to increase and they anticipate a commensurate annual rise in noise levels, and with it the annual onset of the “fresh air versus sleep” dilemma.
‘Who vs. What’ Deflection — The idea that the validity of a person’s actions are determined by their group identity (‘who’ they are) rather than what they actually do, and especially its effects on others, including those around them who share the same group identity. (See also noise denialism)
Woke — 1. (verb, past tense) Deprived of necessary rest by an external disruption, especially noise. Usage: “A car with a modified muffler woke the sleeping residents.” 2. adjective, informal. Selectively progressive, manifested by a ‘libertarian left’ political ideology. Usage: ”They were so woke that they actually tried to justify the deliberately loud vehicle waking the sleeping residents.”
Z-Weighting — Inaptly named acoustic measurements that are actually not weighted (i.e., filtered), but rather just “raw” sound-level data. Contrasts with A-weighting and C-weighting (see above).
_______________
1 The “masculine over-compensation thesis” is the idea that men react to perceived threats to their masculinity by making extreme performances of it, such as revving vehicle engines, installing modified mufflers, over-amplified speakers, etc. (See “Overdoing Gender: A Test of the Masculine Overcompensation Thesis,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 118, No. 4)
2 The biggest modern NIMBYs are the commercial property developers and venue owners who almost never live near the excessively loud enterprises they create, and thus aren’t affected by the noise and other adverse conditions they expose neighboring residents to — and then have the cojones to call the latter NIMBYs when thy complain. Other related definitions of NIMBY include “Noise In Most Backyards” and “Noise In My Bedroom Year-round.”
3 The official definition of noise is “unwanted and / or harmful sound.” The first descriptor is certainly accurate in the social sense of noise, but the idea of ‘unwanted‘ introduces a subjective element — i.e., one’s personal feelings in favor or against a particular sound (e.g., music one doesn’t like) — whether or not it’s excessively loud. This opens the door to unresolvable disputes about who wants to hear it and who doesn’t. The word “harmful” is a far more useful determinant of noise, as it relies on measurable sound levels and discernible physiological effects, such as high blood-pressure, cortisol levels, etc.